UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

621 NW 53rd Street, Suite 7004955 Technology Way

Boca Raton, Florida 3348733431

Telephone: (561)893-0101

March 17, 2017April 9, 2020

Dear Shareholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the 20172020 annual meeting of the shareholders of The GEO Group, Inc. We will hold the meeting virtually, conducted via live audio webcast on Thursday, April 27, 2017,Tuesday, May 19, 2020, at 11:10:00 A.M. (EDT).

This year we are furnishing proxy materials to our shareholders primarily on the Internet rather than mailing paper copies of the materials to each shareholder. As a result, most of you will receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials instead of paper copies of this proxy statement and our annual report. The notice contains instructions on how to access the proxy statement and the annual report over the Internet, as well as instructions on how to request a paper copy of our proxy materials. This process will significantly lowerlowers the costs of printing and distributing our proxy materials. On or about March 17, 2017,April 9, 2020, we mailed to shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials.

Your vote is very important to us. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting virtually, your shares should be represented and voted. After reading the enclosed proxy statement, please vote your shares as soon as possible. Shareholders may vote via the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GEO2017,GEO2020, by telephone, or by completing and returning a proxy card. Submitting a vote before the annual meeting will not preclude you from voting virtually at the meeting should you decide to attend. If you wish to participate in the meeting, please refer to page 44pages 52-53 for additional guidelines.

Sincerely,

George C. Zoley

Chairman of the Board,

Chief Executive Officer and Founder

TABLE OF CONTENTS

THE GEO GROUP, INC.

621 NW 53rd Street, Suite 7004955 Technology Way

Boca Raton, Florida 3348733431

Telephone: (561)893-0101

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders on April 27, 2017May 19, 2020

March 17, 2017April 9, 2020

The annual meeting of the shareholders of The GEO Group, Inc. will be held on Thursday, April 27, 2017,Tuesday, May 19, 2020, at 11:10:00 A.M. (EDT). The meeting will be held virtually, conducted via live audio webcast for the purpose of considering and acting on the following proposals:

Only shareholders of GEO’s common stock of record at the close of business on March 3, 2017,11, 2020, the record date and time fixed by the board of directors, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting. Additional information regarding the proposals to be acted upon at the annual meeting can be found in the accompanying proxy statement.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has adopted a “Notice and Access” rule that allows companies to deliver a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice of Internet Availability”) to shareholders in lieu of a paper copy of the proxy statement and related materials and the Company’s Annual Report to Shareholders (the “Proxy Materials”). The Notice of Internet Availability provides instructions as to how shareholders can access the Proxy Materials online, contains a listing of matters to be considered at the meeting, and sets forth instructions as to how shares can be voted. Shares must be voted either by telephone, online or by completing and returning a proxy card. Shares cannot be voted by marking, writing on and/or returning the Notice of Internet Availability. Any Notices of Internet Availability that are returned will not be counted as votes. Instructions for requesting a paper copy of the Proxy Materials are also set forth on the Notice of Internet Availability.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

John J. BulfinJoe Negron

Senior Vice President, General Counsel

and Corporate Secretary

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY, APRIL 27, 2017.TUESDAY, MAY 19, 2020.

GEO’s proxy statement and annual report are available online at: www.proxyvote.com

i

PROXY STATEMENT

THE GEO GROUP, INC.

621 NW 53rd Street, Suite 7004955 Technology Way

Boca Raton, Florida 3348733431

Telephone: (561)893-0101

March 17, 2017April 9, 2020

The GEO Group, Inc. (“GEO,” the “Company,” “we” or “us”) is furnishing this proxy statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our board of directors (the “Board”) for use at the annual meeting of shareholders on April 27, 2017,May 19, 2020, at 11:10:00 A.M., Eastern Daylight Time. This year’s annual meeting will be a virtual meeting of shareholders, conducted via live audio webcast. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online, vote your shares electronically and submit your questions during the Annual Meeting via a live audio webcast by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GEO2017.GEO2020.Please note that the proxy card provides a means to withhold authority to vote for any individual director nominee. Also note that the format of the proxy card provides an opportunity to specify your choice between approval, disapproval or abstention with respect to the proposals indicated on the proxy card. A proxy card which is properly executed, returned and not revoked will be voted in accordance with the instructions indicated. A proxy voted by telephone or the Internet and not revoked will be voted in accordance with the shareholder’s instructions. If no instructions are given, proxies that are signed and returned or voted by telephone or the Internet will be voted as follows:

“FOR” the election of the nominated directors for the ensuing year;

“FOR” the proposal to ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as the independent registered public accountants of GEO for the fiscal year 2017;2020;

“FOR” the advisory approval of the resolution on named executive officer compensation; and

“FOR”AGAINST”the option of every year asshareholder proposal regarding an annual Lobbying Report, if properly presented before the preferred frequency for future advisory votes on executive compensation.meeting.

Under New York Stock Exchange rules, brokerage firms have authority to vote shares on routine matters for which their customers do not provide voting instructions. The ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accountants for 20172020 is considered a routine matter. As a result, if you hold your shares through a broker and do not direct the broker how to vote your shares on this routine matter, your broker may vote the shares on your behalf.

Under New York Stock Exchange rules, the election of directors, the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation and the advisory vote on the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensationshareholder proposal are not considered a routine matter. As a result, if a brokerage firm does not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner of shares held by the firm, those shares will not be voted and will be considered brokernon-votes with respect to those matters. A brokernon-vote will have no effect on the election of directors, the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation and the advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory vote on executive compensation.shareholder proposal.

This proxy statement, the notice of annual meeting, the proxy card and our 20162019 annual report will be mailed or made accessible via the Internet on or about March 17, 2017.April 9, 2020.

Management is not aware of any other matters to be presented for action by shareholders at the annual meeting.

Holders of GEO common stock at the close of business on March 3, 2017,11, 2020, the record date, will be entitled to one vote for each share of common stock outstanding in their name on the books of GEO at that date. On March 3, 2017,11, 2020, GEO had 75,281,579shares122,375,277 shares of common stock outstanding.

The presence, in person or by proxy, of at least a majority of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding on the record date will constitute a quorum for purposes of the annual meeting. The election of

directors requires a majority of the votes cast. The appointment of Grant Thornton LLP will be ratified if the number of votes cast in favor of ratification exceeds the number of votes cast against ratification. The advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation will be approved if the number of votes cast in favor of approval exceeds the number of votes cast against approval.    The alternative receivingshareholder proposal will be approved if the greatest number of votes with respect tocast in favor of approval exceeds the advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory vote on executive compensation will be considered the frequency that shareholders approve.number cast against approval. Shares of common stock represented by proxies that reflect abstentions or “brokernon-votes” (i.e., shares held by a broker or nominee which are represented at the annual meeting, but with respect to which such broker or nominee is not empowered to vote on a particular proposal) will be counted as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum for the proposal but will not be counted as “votes cast” with respect to the election of directors, the advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation and the advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory vote on executive compensation.shareholder proposal. If less than the majority of the outstanding shares of common stock are represented at the annual meeting, a majority of the shares so represented may adjourn the annual meeting to another date and time.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder

Meeting to be held on Thursday, April 27, 2017.Tuesday, May 19, 2020. The Proxy Statement and

20162019 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at www.proxyvote.com.www.proxyvote.com.

Any person giving a proxy has the power to revoke it any time before it is voted by providing written notice to GEO addressed to the Corporate Secretary, by executing and delivering a later dated proxy, or by participating in the meeting and voting the shares electronically.

The costs of preparation, assembly and mailing this proxy statement and the accompanying materials will be borne by GEO. GEO will also pay the cost of soliciting your proxy and reimbursing brokerage firms and others for forwarding proxy materials to you. Certain of GEO’s officers, directors and employees may participate in the solicitation of proxies by mail, personal interview, letter, fax and telephone without additional consideration.

PROPOSAL 1:

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Director Nominees

GEO’s board of directors is currently comprised of six (6)eight (8) members. All of the nominees are presently directors of GEO andGEO. Except for Mr. Gordo who was appointed to GEO’s board of directors subsequent to GEO’s 2019 annual meeting, all nominees were elected by the shareholders at GEO’s 20162019 annual meeting. Mr. Zoley suggested Mr. Gordo as a prospective Board candidate to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees for their consideration and evaluation.

If instructed, the persons named on the accompanying proxy card will vote for the election of the nominees named below to serve for the ensuing year and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. If any nominee for director shall become unavailable (which management has no reason to believe will be the case), it is intended that the shares represented by the enclosed proxy card will be voted for any such replacement or substitute nominee as may be nominated by the board of directors.

The following is a brief biographical statement for each director nominee:

Director Nominees

		Anne N. Foreman — Ms. Foreman has served as a director of GEO since 2002. Since 1999, Ms. Foreman has been a court appointed trustee of the National Gypsum Company Bodily Injury Trust, a trust created for the purpose of resolving asbestos related bodily injury liabilities of the National Gypsum Company.liabilities. Ms. Foreman served as Under Secretary of the United States Air Force from September 1989 until January 1993. Prior to herthis appointment, as Under Secretary, Ms. Foreman was General Counsel of the Department of the Air Force, a member of the Department’s Intelligence Oversight Board and the Department’s Chief Ethics Officer. She practiced law in the Washington office of Bracewell and Patterson and with the British solicitorsLondon office of Boodle Hatfield, Co., in London, England from 1979 to 1985. Ms. Foreman is a former member of the U.S. Foreign Service, and served in Beirut, Lebanon; Tunis, Tunisia; and the U.S. Mission to the U.N. Ms. Foreman earned a bachelor’s degree, magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, in history and French, and a master’s in history from the University of Southern California in Los Angeles. She holds her juris doctor, cum laude, from American University in Washington, D.C. where she was a member of the Law Review. She was awarded an honorary doctorate of law from Troy State University. Ms. Foreman was twice awardedserved on the Air Force Medal for Distinguished Civilian Service.board of Trust Services, Inc. beginning in 1999 and has served as chair since 2009. Ms. Foreman also served on the Board of The Wackenhut Corporation from 1993 to 2002, a then publicly-traded security and corrections corporation, for nine years. SheMs. Foreman has served on public and private U.S. and U.K. boards of directors, and on their audit, compensation and corporate governance committees for 20 years. Ms. Foreman is chairman of the board of directors of Trust Services, Inc., a claims-processing facility located in Greenville, Texas which processes the claims of and provides related financial management and administrative services to various asbestos and silica trusts. She has been a member of the board since 1998. Ms. Foreman is on the board of directors of Ultra Electronics Defense, Inc. (UEDI), a US holding company which controls ten US companies owned by the publicly-traded UK corporation, Ultra Electronics, Plc. UEDI companies specialize in defense, a specialist electrical and electronics and other defense solutions and are headquartered in Fishers, New York. Ms. Foreman has been a UEDI board member since 1999.engineering company.   Ms. Foreman brings extensive legal, government contracting and international experience to the board of directors. Her service in two Senate-confirmed positions in the Air Force, and in private sector and government positions abroad provide leadership, government affairs and international transactional skills. Her experience as a board member of other companies strengthens the board of directors’ collective knowledge, capabilities and experience.

Jose Gordo — Mr. Gordo has over 20 years of experience in business management, private equity, corporate finance and business law. Since June 2017, Mr. Gordo has served as the Managing Partner of a general partnership that invests in and actively oversees small andmedium-sized privately held companies, with a focus on the healthcare, technology and financial services industries. From 2013 to early 2017, Mr. Gordo served as the Chief Financial Officer of magicJack Vocaltec Ltd., a publicly-traded company in the telecommunications industry. Prior to that position, Mr. Gordo served as a Managing Director at The Comvest Group, a Florida-based private equity firm. Mr. Gordo was also previously a partner at the national law firm of Akerman LLP, where he specialized in corporate law matters, advising public and private companies and private equity firms on mergers and acquisitions and capital markets transactions. He received a J.D. degree from Georgetown University Law Center and a B.A. degree from the University of Miami.

Mr. Gordo brings extensive experience in business management, finance, corporate strategy, operations and business law to the Board of Directors. His expertise in these areas and his deep understanding of GEO and its industry will strengthen the board of directors’ collective knowledge, capabilities and experience.

The election of each director will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by holders of the shares of common stock present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

The board of directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” each of the sixeight nominees for director.

Director Emeritus

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF GEO

The executive officers of GEO as of March 3, 201716, 2020 are as follows:

George C. Zoley — Please refer to the biographical information listed above in the “Director Nominees” section.

Brian R. Evans— Brian R. Evans joined GEO in 2000 and has over 20 years of business management experience. Since joining the company, Mr. Evans assumed the role of Chief Financial Officer of the Companyhas served in August 2009. Mr. Evans was GEO’sincreasingly senior business management positions including as Vice President of Finance, and Treasurer from May 2007 to August 2009 and Chief Accounting Officer, from May 2003 to Augustand Controller and was named GEO’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in 2009.

As Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Evans joinedis responsible for the overall financial management of GEO and its subsidiaries and the Company’s acquisition and growth initiatives. Since joining the Company, Mr. Evans has overseen significant financial growth and shareholder value creation.

During his tenure at GEO, Mr. Evans has been instrumental in October 2000 as Corporate Controller. From 1994 untilsuccessfully executing the Company’s strategy for three secondary public offerings of equity; the execution of multiple financing transactions; and the successful completion of major business transactions including the acquisitions of Correctional Services Corporation in 2005, CentraCore Properties Trust in 2007, Cornell Companies in 2010, BI Incorporated in 2011, LCS Corrections in 2014 and Community Education Centers in 2017. Mr. Evans was also instrumental in GEO’s highly successful conversion to a Real Estate Investment Trust in 2013.

Prior to joining GEO, Mr. Evans was with the West Palm Beach office ofworked for Arthur Andersen LLP as a Manager in the Audit and Business Advisory Services Group from 1994 until joining GEO. During his tenure at Arthur Andersen, Mr. Evans supervised the financial statement audits of both public and private companies and city and county governments. From 1990 tountil 1994, Mr. Evans served in the U.S. Navy as an officerOfficer in the Supply Corps. Corps of the United States Navy and was assigned to the USS Monterey in Jacksonville, Florida.

Mr. Evans has a bachelor’s degreegraduated in Accounting1990 from the University of Notre Dame andwith a Bachelor’s Degree in Accounting. Mr. Evans is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

J. David Donahue — Mr.J. David Donahue was appointed Senior Vice President and President of GEO Corrections and Detention in February 2016. He joined GEO as the Eastern RegionalRegion Vice President in 2009 after a distinguished career in corrections with the States of Indiana and Kentucky as well as the Federal Bureau of Prisons. AsIn his previous role as the Eastern Regional Vice President, he was responsible for the operational oversight of over 2024 correctional facilities encompassing over 27,00031,000 beds. Mr. Donahue was promoted to Senior Vice President and President, GEO Corrections and Detention in January 2016.

Prior to joining GEO, Mr. Donahue served as Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Correction from November 2004Correction. As Commissioner, he led a workforce of over 9,000 employees, supervising nearly 39,000 offenders in addition to 3,000 Juvenile Offenders and those individuals placed on community supervision. During his tenure with

Indiana, Mr. Donahue worked diligently to instill best correctional practices. He employed his leadership skills to provide better protection to the public through August 2008. an improvedsex-offender registry system, enhanced facility security with the addition ofstate-of-the-art equipment and protocols, consolidated services to increase departmental efficiency and effectiveness, and prepared offenders for reentry using model case management practices.

Prior to leading the Indiana Department of Correction, Mr. Donahue served as Deputy Commissioner for the Kentucky Department of Corrections. In this position, he provided administrative policy direction to all departmental divisions. He was responsible for the planning and supervision of duties for the Directors of the Division of Administrative Services, the Division of the Corrections from January 2001 through November 2004. Training, the Division of Correctional Industries, and the Branch Managers of Offender Information and Information and Technology.

Mr. Donahue began his corrections career as a Correctional Officer. During his correctional career he moved up the ranks serving in various positions including Case Worker, Unit Manager, Executive Assistant and Warden of several facilities in the country. Mr. Donahue now serves as Vice President of the American Correctional Association (“ACA”) and is anACA-Certified Corrections Executive. In addition, he is an active member of the American Correctional AssociationACA and serves on the Restrictive HousingSub-Committee. In addition, he isan ACA-Certified Corrections Executive. HeMr. Donahue is also a member of the Association of State Correctional Administrators. He attended Eastern Kentucky University, where he earned his Bachelors of Science in Police Administration. He later attended Spalding University, where he completed coursework in the Masters of Arts in Teaching Graduate Program.

Ann M. Schlarb —Dr. Schlarb joined GEO in 2011 as Vice President of Intensive Supervision and Appearance Program (“ISAP”) Services as a result of GEO’s acquisition of B.I. Incorporated, (“BI”B.I.”). She was promoted to Divisional Vice President, B.I. Incorporated, in May 2012 and was then promoted to Senior Vice President and President of GEO Care in July 2014. Dr. Schlarb began her criminal justice career in 1986 working as a detention officer for the Bexar County Sheriff’s Department and later as a probation officer and Assistant Director of Operations and Treatment for Probation Violators facility in Bexar County, Texas. Dr. Schlarb joined BI Incorporated in 1995 and was involved in the development, implementation, and operations of two different national programs, one providing supervision and treatment services to offenders in the criminal justice system,Criminal Justice System, and the other overseeing field operations for the immigration services division of BI. Dr. Schlarb left BI briefly to complete her doctoral degree in 2009 in Organizational Psychology, during which she remained a consultant. Dr. Schlarb was named Divisional Vice President in May 2012 and managed the BI location monitoring and immigration services division within GEO Care. Promoted to Senior Vice President and President of GEO Care in July 2014, Dr. Schlarb is now responsible for the GEO Care division of The GEO Group, which encompasses the ‘GEO Continuum of Care’ organization, intensive residential treatment,andnon-residential programming, youth services, electronic monitoring equipment and services, and community-based correctional and immigration services.

Dr. Schlarb receivedbegan her B.A. from the UniversityCriminal Justice career in 1986 working as a detention and probation officer, and later as Assistant Director of Texas,Operations and Treatment for a Probation Violators facility in San Antonio.Antonio, Texas. She earned her Master’s Degree from the University of Phoenix and her Ph.D. from Walden University,degree in Organizational Management and holds several criminal justice certifications.

John J. BulfinJoe Negron — AsMr. Negron joined GEO in December 2018 and became the GEO’s Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since 2000, Mr. Bulfin has oversight responsibility for all GEO, corporate governance, litigation, investigations, and professional responsibility. Mr. Bulfin is a member of the Florida Bar and the American Bar Associations. He has been a trial lawyer since 1978 and is a Florida Bar Board Certified Civil trial lawyer. He has served on the Grievance Committee for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit of Florida and has served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of Palm Beach.effective General Counsel January 1, 2019. Prior to joining GEO, Mr. Negron has had 30 years of experience in 2000,business law and complex corporate and commercial litigation. Mr. Bulfin was a founding partnerNegron has worked for several prestigious Florida law firms throughout his career, most recently in the litigation practice at Akerman LLP. Mr. Negron also served in the Florida Legislature for fifteen years, including service as both House and Senate Appropriations Chair, as well as President of the law firm Wiederhold, Moses, Bulfin & Rubin,Florida Senate in West Palm Beach, Florida. his final term.

Mr. Bulfin attended the University of Florida,Negron received his bachelor’sundergraduate degree cum laude from Regis College in Denver, Colorado andStetson University, his juris doctorJuris Doctor degree from LoyolaEmory University School of Law and a Masters in Chicago, Illinois.Public Administration from HarvardUniversity.

David J. Venturella — Mr. Venturella joined GEO in July 2012 as Executive Vice President, Corporate Development. In January 2014, he was promoted to Senior Vice President, Business Development. Mr. Venturella is responsible for leading GEO’s business and proposal development efforts. Prior to joining GEO, Mr. Venturella served in various leadership positions including most recently as the Assistant Director for the Office of Enforcement and Removal Operations for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”)ICE from February 2011 to June 2012.

In addition to his22-year career with ICE, Mr. Venturella has worked in the private sector in business development and strategic planning. He served as Director of Business Development for the Global Security and Engineering Services Unit withL-3 Communications in Chantilly, Virginia from September 2007 to May 2008. He worked for USIS, Inc. fromFrom May 2004 to September 2007, servinghe served as Vice President of the Homeland Security Business Unit for USIS in Falls Church, Virginia, where he was credited with increasing annual revenues by an average of 15 percent during his tenure, and serving tenure. He also servedas Director of Business Development for USIS in the company’s Professional Services Division. Division and served as Director of Business Development for the Global Security and Engineering Services Unit withL-3 Communications in Chantilly, Virginia from September 2007 to May 2008. David Venturella has more than 26 years experience in federal law enforcement operations and business development. His expertise includes strategic planning, organizational management, project development and program execution.

Mr. Venturella has a Bachelor of Science degree in Political Science from Bradley University in Peoria, Illinois. He has also completed the Harvard/MIT Executive Leadership Course at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government.

Thomas M. WierdsmaRichard K. Long — As GEO’sMr. Long joined GEO in 2017 after a distinguished career working for Balfour Beatty Construction for the last 30 years. Mr. Long has developed extensive expertise with commercial and federal government construction as well as engineering projects using design-build and construction management at risk delivery methods for both public and private sector clients, with a combined construction value in excess of $5.0 billion. During his30-year career at Balfour Beatty Construction, Mr. Long has held positions of Civil Engineer, Project Engineer, Chief Estimator, Assistant Project Manager, Vice President of Preconstruction, Senior Vice President of Project Development since January 2007,Business Acquisition, and Senior Vice President & South Florida Business Unit Leader responsible for leading Balfour Beatty $600 million annual South Florida business.

With 32 years of construction experience, Mr. Wierdsma has oversight responsibilityLong also finds time for corporate real estate activitiesindustry service. He is a long-time member and entitlement, designpast-chairman of Florida’s largest chapter of the Associated Builders and constructionContractors (“ABC”). Additionally, as founding member and past-president of GEO’s newthe Society of American Military Engineers (“SAME”) South Florida chapter, Mr. Long accepted multiple accolades at the association’s 2012 National Joint Engineer Training Conference.

Mr. Long received his Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering from the University of Missouri and expanded facilities. Prior to joining GEO, Mr. Wierdsma served for 25 years with Colorado-based Hensel Phelps Construction Company in a number of increasingly senior positions, the last being Director of Project Planning and Development. Mr. Wierdsma attended Valparaiso University and received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Civil Engineering. He is a Registered Professional Engineer and a Designated Design Build Professional.Construction Management from the University of Louisiana-Monroe.

Ronald A. Brack — Mr. Brack assumed the role of Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller for the Company in August 2009. Mr. Brack was GEO’s Vice President and Controller from January 2008 to August 2009 and Controller from April 2007 to January 2008. Mr. Brack joined GEO in May 2005 as Assistant Controller. From 2000 until joining GEO, Mr. Brack was with Fort Lauderdale, Florida based NationsRent, Inc. where his most recent position was Assistant Controller. From 1997 to 2000, Mr. Brack was with the Fort Lauderdale office of Arthur Andersen, LLP where his most recent position was Senior Auditor in the Audit and Business Advisory Services Group. Prior to that time, Mr. Brack spent over ten years in the fleet management business with World Omni Leasing, Inc. and GE Capital Fleet Services. Mr. Brack attended Florida Atlantic University and has a bachelor’s degree in Economics from Vanderbilt University. He is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

Shayn P. March — Mr. March joined GEO as Vice President of Finance and Treasurer in March 2009. Prior to joining GEO, Mr. March served as a Managing Director for the Corporate Investment Banking group at BNP Paribas, where he worked for eleven years in increasing capacities. From 1995 to 1997, Mr. March was employed at Sanwa Bank in the Corporate Finance Department. From 1988 to 1994, Mr. March was employed at UJB Financial in the Finance and Credit Audit Departments. Mr. March earned his Masters in Business Administration in Financial Management from the Lubin School of Business at Pace University and his Bachelor of Arts in Economics at Rutgers University.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table shows the number of shares of GEO’s common stock that were beneficially owned at March 3, 201716, 2020 (unless stated otherwise) by (i) each nominee for election as director at the 20172020 annual meeting of shareholders, (ii) each named executive officer (as defined below), (iii) all director nominees and executive officers as a group, and (iv) each person or group who was known by GEO to beneficially own more than 5% of GEO’s outstanding common stock.

(5)

Includes 2,46816, 2020 and 1,090,798 shares of restricted stock that are unvested but have voting rights held by directors and executive officers (16 persons in total). 87,241 shares of common stock whichheld by Mr. Wierdsma owns indirectly for the benefit of B. Wierdsma, Oliver Thomas Adams, Lauren Diane Wierdsma and Robert Oliver Wierdsma.Evans are pledged as security.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ITS COMMITTEES AND OTHER CORPORATE GOVERNANCE INFORMATION

GEO’s board of directors held ninefour meetings during fiscal year 2016.2019. Each director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the board of directors and of the meetings held by all board committees on which such director served.

Director Independence

Pursuant to the corporate governance standards applicable to companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), the board of directors must be comprised of a majority of directors who qualify as independent directors. In determining independence, each year the board of directors affirmatively determines whether directors have a “material relationship” with GEO. When assessing the “materiality” of a director’s relationship with GEO, the board of directors considers all relevant facts and circumstances, not merely from the director’s standpoint, but also from that of the persons or organizations with which the director has an affiliation. An independent director is free from any relationship with GEO that may impair the director’s ability to make independent judgments. Particular attention is paid to whether the director is independent from management and, with respect to organizations affiliated with a director with which GEO does business, the frequency and regularity of the business conducted, and whether the business is carried out at arm’s length on substantially the same terms to GEO as those prevailing at the time from unrelated third parties for comparable business transactions. Material relationships can include commercial, banking, industrial, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships.

Applying the NYSE’s independence standards, the board of directors has determined that, Clarence E. Anthony, Anne N. Foreman, Richard H. Glanton, Guido Van Hauwermeiren, Christopher C. Wheeler and Julie Myers Wood qualify as independent under the NYSE’s corporate governance standards, and that the board of directors is therefore comprised of a majority of independent directors. The board of directors’ determination that each of these directors is independent was based on the fact that none of the directors had a material relationship with GEO outside of such person’s position as a director, including a relationship that would disqualify such director from being considered independent under the NYSE’s listing standards.

Committees

Under our corporate governance guidelines, the board of directors has established eight standing committees. The members of the board of directors serving on these committees and the functions of those committees are set forth below.

Audit and Finance Committee

The Audit and Finance Committee met sevensix times during fiscal year 2016.2019. The Report of the Audit and Finance Committee is included in this proxy statement.

All of the members of the Audit and Finance Committee are independent (as independence is defined under Exchange Act Rule10A-3, as well as under Section 303A.02 of the NYSE’s listing standards). In addition, the board of directors has determined that Mr. Glanton is the “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined under Item 407(d)(5) of RegulationS-K of the SEC’s rules.

The Audit and Finance Committee has a written charter adopted by the board of directors. It can be found on our website at http://www.geogroup.com by clicking on the link “Social Responsibility” on our homepage and then clicking on the linklinks “Governance with Integrity—CorporateIntegrity-Corporate Governance.” In addition, the charter is available in print to any shareholder who requests it by contacting our Executive Vice President of Corporate Relations at561-999-7306.561-893-0101. Pursuant to the charter, the main functions and responsibilities of the Audit and Finance Committee include the following:

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee met fivesix times during fiscal year 2016.2019. The Report of the Compensation Committee is included in this proxy statement.

All of the members of the Compensation Committee are independent (as independence is defined under Section 303A.02 of the NYSE’s listing standards).

The Compensation Committee has a written charter adopted by the board of directors. It can be found on our website at http://www.geogroup.com by clicking on the link “Social Responsibility” on our homepage and then clicking on the linklinks “Governance with Integrity—CorporateIntegrity-Corporate Governance.” In addition, the charter is available in print to any shareholder who requests it by contacting our Executive Vice President of Corporate Relations at561-999-7306.561-893-0101. Pursuant to the charter, the main functions and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee include the following:

For further information on the Compensation Committee’s processes and procedures for consideration and determination of executive compensation, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” elsewhere in this proxy statement.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met sixfive times during fiscal year 2016.2019.

All of the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are independent (as independence is defined under Section 303A.02 of the NYSE’s listing standards).

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has a written charter adopted by the board of directors. It can be found on our website at http://www.geogroup.com by clicking on the link “Social Responsibility” on our homepage and then clicking on the linklinks “Governance with Integrity—CorporateIntegrity-Corporate Governance.” In addition, the charter is available in print to any shareholder who requests it by contacting our Executive Vice President of Corporate Relations at561-999-7306.561-893-0101. Pursuant to the charter, the main functions and responsibilities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee include the following:

In fulfilling the committee’s duties to identify and recommend candidates for election to our board of directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the mix of skills, experience, character, commitment, and diversity — diversity being broadly construed to mean a variety of opinions, perspectives and backgrounds, such as gender, race and ethnicity differences, as well as other differentiating characteristics, all in the context of the requirements of our board of directors at the time of election.

Executive Committee

Periodically during fiscal year 2016,2019, members of the Executive Committee informally discussed various matters relating to GEO’s business. The Executive Committee has full authority to exercise all the powers of the board of directors between meetings of the board of directors, except as reserved by the board of directors. During 2016, the Executive Committee acted four times through resolutions adopted at duly convened meetings or by unanimous written consent. All actions taken by the Executive Committee in 20162019 were ratified by the board of directors at their next quarterly meeting.

Corporate Planning Committee

The Corporate Planning Committee periodically reviews with management various corporate strategic initiatives, including potential merger and acquisition activities, business expansion issues and corporate finance matters.

Operations and Oversight Committee

The Operations and Oversight Committee reviews with management various issues relating to our operations that may arise from time to time.

Legal Steering Committee

The Legal Steering Committee reviews with management strategic issues with respect to material litigation and other discrete legal issues.

Independent Committee

The Independent Committee considers matters that may arise from time to time that the board of directors designates for independent director review.

Director Identification and Selection

The processes for director selection and director qualifications are set forth in Section 3 of our Corporate Governance Guidelines. The board of directors, acting on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, will nominate a slate of director candidates for election at each annual meeting of shareholders and will elect directors to fill vacancies, including vacancies created as a result of any increase in the size of the board, between annual meetings. Nominees for director are selected on the basis of outstanding achievement in their personal careers, broad experience, wisdom, integrity, ability to make independent, analytical inquiries, understanding of the business environment, and willingness to devote adequate time to the duties of the board of directors. The board believes that each director should have a basic understanding of (i) the principal operational and financial objectives and plans and strategies of GEO, (ii) the results of operations and financial condition of GEO and of any significant subsidiaries or business segments, and (iii) the relative standing of GEO and its business segments in relation to its competitors. The board is committed to diversified membership and it does not and will not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion or disability in selecting nominees. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may, to the extent it deems appropriate, engage a third party professional search firm to identify and review new director candidates and their credentials.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider proposed nominees whose names are submitted to it by shareholders; however, it doesshareholders. We adopted proxy access in advance of our 2017 annual meeting of shareholders.

Our proxy access provisions are set forth in Article II, Section 6 of our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws (“Bylaws”). The proxy access provisions permit a shareholder, or a group of up to twenty (20) shareholders, owning three percent (3%) or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock continuously for at least three (3) years, to nominate twenty percent (20%) of the number of directors then in office (rounding down to the nearest whole number) provided that the shareholder or group and each nominee satisfy the eligibility, procedural and disclosure requirements for proxy access as specified in the Bylaws, including that the Company receive notice of such nominations between 90 and 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the previous year’s annual meeting of shareholders. Since our annual meeting for 2020 is scheduled for May 19, 2020, any nomination pursuant to our proxy access process to be considered at the 2021 annual meeting must be properly submitted to us not have a formal process for that consideration. earlier than January 19, 2021 or later than February 18, 2021.

There are no differences between the considerations and qualifications for director nominees that are recommended by shareholders and director nominees recommended by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. TheOther than adopting proxy access, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has not adopted a formal process because it believes that the informal consideration process has been adequate to date. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee intends to review periodically whether a more formal policy should be adopted. If a shareholder

wishes to suggest a proposed name of a nominee for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee outside of the proxy access process, the name of that nominee and related personal information should be forwarded to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, in care of the Corporate Secretary, at least six months before the next annual meeting to assure time for meaningful consideration by the committee.

Board Leadership Structure

Our CEO also serves as the Chairman of the board of directors. Richard H. Glanton has served as Lead Independent Director of the Company since January 1, 2011.

Mr. Glanton has been a director of GEO since 1998 and is currently the Chairman of the Audit and Finance Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Independent Committee and a member of the Executive Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Operations and Oversight Committee and the Legal Steering Committee. As the Lead Independent Director, Mr. Glanton has input to the Chairman of the board on preparation of agendas for board and committee meetings. Mr. Glanton chairs board meetings when the Chairman of the board is not in attendance and provides input to the independent directors and ensures that the effectiveness of the board is assessed on a regular basis. The Lead Independent Director reports to the board regarding deliberations of the independent directors and may recommend special meetings of the independent directors as necessary. Because of Mr. Glanton’s long history as a board member and his service as the Chairman of the Audit and Finance Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Independent Committee, the board believes that Mr. Glanton is uniquely qualified to serve as the Lead Independent Director of the Company. In 2012, in connection with our conversion to a REIT, Mr. Glanton was the chairman of a special committee created to review and manage the divestiture of GEO Care, Inc.

As a company that is focused on its core business, we believe the CEO is in the best position to direct the independent directors’ attention on the issues of greatest importance to the Company and its shareholders. Since our CEO knows the Company’s business, is a pioneer in the industry and has over thirty years of experience, we believe that our CEO is the appropriate person to lead the board of directors. Our overall corporate governance policies and practices combined with the strength of our independent directors, including our Lead Independent Director, and our internal controls minimize any potential conflicts that may result from combining the roles of Chairman and CEO.

We believe the current leadership structure of the board of directors supports the risk oversight functions described below by providing independent leadership at the board and committee level through the Lead Independent Director with ultimate oversight by the full board of directors led by our Chairman and CEO. The board of directors periodically reviews and considers whether the current board leadership structure continues to be appropriate for our Company.

Board Risk Oversight

Our board of directors has overall responsibility for risk oversight with a focus on the most significant risks facing the Company. Throughout the year, the board of directors and the committees to which it has delegated responsibility dedicate a portion of their meetings to review and discuss specific risk topics in greater detail. The board of directors has delegated responsibility for the oversight of specific risks to the following committees:

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The board of directors has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics applicable to GEO’s directors, officers, employees, agents and representatives, including its consultants, which we refer to as the Code of Conduct. The Code of Conduct strives to deter wrongdoing and promote honest and ethical conduct, the avoidance of conflicts of interest, full, fair, accurate, timely and transparent disclosure, compliance with the applicable government and self-regulatory organization laws, rules and regulations, prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Conduct, and accountability for compliance with the Code of Conduct. The Code of Conduct can be found on our website at http://www.geogroup.com by clicking on the link “Social Responsibility” on our homepage and then clicking on the link “Governance with Integrity—Corporate Governance.Integrity-Business Conduct & Ethics.” In addition, the Code of Conduct is available in print to any shareholder who requests it by contacting our Executive Vice President of Corporate Relations at561-999-7306.561-893-0101.

Code of Ethics for CEO, Senior Financial Officers and Other Employees

Pursuant to Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the board of directors has also adopted a code of ethics for the CEO, its senior financial officers and all other employees, which we refer to as the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers. The text of this Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers is located in Section 19 of GEO’s Code of Conduct. The Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers can be found on our website at http://www.geogroup.com by clicking on the link “Social Responsibility” on our homepage and then clicking on the link “Governance with Integrity—Corporate Governance.Integrity-Business Conduct & Ethics.” In addition, the Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers is available in print to any shareholder who requests it by contacting our Executive Vice President of Corporate Relations at561-999-7306.561-893-0101.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The board of directors has adopted corporate governance guidelines to promote the effective functioning of the board of directors and its committees, and the continued implementation of good corporate governance practices. The corporate governance guidelines address matters such as the role and structure of the board of directors, the selection, qualifications and continuing education of members of the board of directors, board meetings,non-employee director executive sessions, board self-evaluation, board committees, CEO performance review, succession planning,non-employee director compensation, certain shareholder matters and certain shareholder rights.

The corporate governance guidelines can be found on our website at http://www.geogroup.com by clicking on the link “Social Responsibility” on our homepage and then clicking on the link “Governance with Integrity—CorporateIntegrity-Corporate Governance.” In addition, the corporate governance guidelines are available in print to any shareholder who requests them by contacting our Executive Vice President of Corporate Relations at561-999-7306.561-893-0101.

Annual Board and Committee Self-Assessments andNon-Employee Director Executive Sessions

The board of directors conducts a self-assessment annually, which is reported by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to the board of directors. In addition, the Audit and Finance Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also undergo annual self-assessments of their performance. Thenon-employee directors of the board of directors meet in executive session at least twice per year and such meetings are presided over by a presiding director who is typically the chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, who is currently Ms. Foreman.Mr. Wheeler.

Communications with Directors

The board of directors has adopted a process to facilitate written communications by shareholders or other interested parties to the entire board, the independent members of the board as a group or any individual member of the board, including the presiding director fornon-employee director executive sessions. Persons wishing to write to the board of directors of GEO, or to a specified director (including the presiding director fornon-employee director executive sessions) or a committee of the board, should send correspondence to the Corporate Secretary at 621 NW 53rd Street, Suite 700,4955 Technology Way, Boca Raton, Florida 33487.33431.

The Corporate Secretary will forward to the directors all communications that, in his or her judgment, are appropriate for consideration by the directors. Examples of communications that would not be appropriate for consideration by the directors include commercial solicitations and matters not relevant to the shareholders, to the functioning of the board, or to the affairs of GEO.

Board Member Attendance at Annual Meetings

GEO encourages all of its directors to attend the annual meeting of shareholders. We generally hold a board meeting coincident with our annual meeting to minimize director travel obligations and facilitate their attendance at the annual meeting of shareholders. All of our directors, except for Mr. Gordo who was not a director at the time, attended the 20162019 annual meeting of shareholders.

AdoptionPublication of Globalthe First Annual Human Rights Policy and Ongoing DialogueESG Report

In November 2012,On September 26, 2019, GEO entered into a dialogue withpublished its first annual Human Rights and Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) Report. The 2018 Human Rights and ESG Report is based on 2018 data. The Report was developed referencing the U.S. Jesuit Conference which included representatives from the National Jesuit Committee on Investment ResponsibilityGlobal Reporting Initiative Standards and the Interfaith Center for Corporate ResponsibilityUN Guiding Principles on Business and Mercy Investments. Human Rights.

The purpose of the dialogue was the adoption of a corporate2018 Human Rights policy. On February 14, 2013, GEO’s Board of Directors adopted a Global Human Rights Policy. Representatives of the Jesuit Conference and Mercy Investments have toured GEO facilities and are continuing the collaboration with GEO towards full implementation of the policy.

Additional information on GEO’s Global Human Rights PolicyESG Report can be found athttp://geogroup.com/human_rights.www.geogroup.com/Portals/0/HumanRightsESG2018.pdf

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Grant Thornton LLP (“Grant Thornton”) served as GEO’s independent registered public accountants in fiscal years 20162019 and 2015.2018. A member of Grant Thornton will be present at the annual meeting to make a statement if so desired and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. The following sets forth the aggregate fees billed to GEO by Grant Thornton in fiscal years 20162019 and 2015.2018.

The Audit and Finance Committee of the board of directors has implemented procedures to ensure that all audit and permittednon-audit services provided to GEO arepre-approved by the Audit and Finance Committee. All of the audit, audit-related, tax and all other services provided by Grant Thornton to GEO in 20162019 and 20152018 were approved by the Audit and Finance Committee pursuant to these procedures. Allnon-audit services provided in 20162019 and 20152018 were reviewed with the Audit and Finance Committee, which concluded that the provision of such services by Grant Thornton was compatible with the maintenance of that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions.

Audit and Finance CommitteePre-Approvals of Audit, Audit-Related, Tax and PermissibleNon-Audit Services

The Audit and Finance Committee periodically approves the provision of various audit, audit-related, tax and other services by Grant Thornton. The Audit and Finance Committee plans to continue to review andpre-approve such services as appropriate. In addition, the Audit and Finance Committee has delegated to its Chairman, Richard H. Glanton, the authority to grant, on behalf of the Audit and Finance Committee, thepre-approvals required under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for the provision by Grant Thornton to GEO of auditing and permissiblenon-audit services; provided, however, that any decision made by Mr. Glanton with respect to any suchpre-approvals must be presented at the next regularly scheduled full Audit and Finance Committee meeting that is held after such decision is made.

All of the services provided by Grant Thornton to GEO in 20162019 and 20152018 were approved by the Audit and Finance Committee pursuant to these procedures. The Audit and Finance Committee will continue to review andpre-approve such services as appropriate.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS

Role of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee of our board of directors establishes and regularly reviews our compensation philosophy and programs, exercises authority with respect to the determination and payment of base and incentive compensation to executive officers and administers the 2011 employee stock purchase plan and our 20142018 stock incentive plan. Our Compensation Committee consists of three members, each of whom is independent as that term is defined in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations that have been promulgated under that Act, and in the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter that was first adopted by our board of directors in February 2004 and has been amended periodically. The charter more fully describes the role, responsibilities and functioning of the Compensation Committee. A current copy of this charter can be viewed on our website at www.geogroup.com by clicking the link “Social Responsibility” on our homepage and then clicking the linklinks “Governance with Integrity—Integrity — Corporate Governance”.

Say-on-Pay Results

At our 20162019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, over 98%98.5% of the votes cast voted to approve the advisory resolution on our executive compensation referred to as the“say-on-pay” vote. The Compensation Committee believes that the positive outcome of thesay-on-pay vote supports the compensation arrangements established by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee considered the results of the shareholder vote on the 20162019“say-on-pay” proposal as one of the many factors relevant in connection with the discharge of its responsibilities along with the advice of its independent compensation consultant and shareholder feedback. During 2016,2019, the Compensation Committee continued the compensation program in place during 20152018 with the changes noted below under the section titled, “Why Each Element of Compensation is Paid and How the Amount of Each Element is Determined”.

Role and Independence of Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee assessed the independence of Pay Governance LLC, (“Pay Governance”), a nationally recognized executive compensation consultant, taking into account the following factors:

Pay Governance has attested to its independence and does not provide any services to GEO other than those related to executive compensation consulting. Based on its assessment, the Compensation Committee agreed that the compensation consultant is independent and that the compensation consultant’s work has not raised any conflict of interest.

During 2016,2019, the Compensation Committee engaged Pay Governance to perform the following services: (i) a peer group analysis and review of the compensation levels of the executive officers; (ii) review the proxy statement for the 20162019 annual shareholders meeting including consultation related to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of the proxy statement; (ii)(iii) calculation of the Total Shareholder Return (TSR)(“TSR”) Performance to determine the performance-based restricted stock payout levels and,

(iii)levels; (iv) calculation of the

Accounting Fair Value for performance-based restricted stock awards.awards; (v) a peer group analysis and review ofnon-employee director compensation: and (vi) a review of executive compensation trends and developments. Other than as described above, Pay Governance was not asked to perform any other services for us in 2016.2019. GEO paid Pay Governance a total of $15,965$88,089 related to its work for the Compensation Committee in 2016.2019.

Under its charter, the Compensation Committee has the ability to retain any advisors it deems necessary or desirable in order for it to discharge its duties. The Compensation Committee also has sole authority to terminate the retention of any advisor it has retained.

Process for Determining Compensation

When making decisions regarding the compensation of named executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee considers competitive market data and analyses prepared by Pay Governance, historical pay to the named executive officers and the appropriateness of such compensation, including by comparing it to a peer group of companies periodically. From time to time,Annually, the Compensation Committee will use peer group and broader general industry data to obtain a general understanding of compensation practices and therefore ensure that it is acting in an informed and responsible manner to make sure our executive compensation program is competitive. The Compensation Committee viewedviews peer group data as one factor in assisting its compensation decisions, but did not engage in benchmarking or rely wholly or in part on this information.decisions. In 2016,2019, the Compensation Committee did not askasked Pay Governance to conduct a peer group analysis to evaluate our compensation programs and practices as a whole, orand the specific compensation of anylevels of our named executive officers. When evaluating pay levels and practices of peer companies within the REIT industry, the Compensation Committee has focused on data from the group ofsimilarly-sized, equity REITs:REITs listed below. GGP Inc. was excluded from the historical peer group as a result of its acquisition by Brookfield Property Partners in August 2018. After making this exclusion and determining that the historical peer group continued to be appropriate on the basis of revenue size and with all companies generally focused on the specialty REIT industry, the Compensation Committee did not make any additional changes to the following peer group for 2019:

The Compensation Committee also considers the compensation recommendations set forth by the Chief Executive Officer for named executive officers other than himself. Under the Compensation Committee’s charter, the Chief Executive Officer cannot provide the Compensation Committee with a compensation recommendation for himself. When considering compensation matters generally, and the compensation packages of the named executive officers in particular, the Compensation Committee meets in executive session outside the presence of the named executive officers. The Compensation Committee uses its experience and judgment to makeand considers performance of the Company and the executive officer in making final compensation decisions.

Important Factors Given Particular Consideration by the Compensation Committee in Setting Compensation for the Named Executive Officers

In setting executive compensation for our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee gives particular attention and focus to the following factors over a several year-period:

Applying these factors to our Company during the previous several years in setting CEO and other named executive officer compensation, the Compensation Committee considered the following:

GEO has entered a definitive merger agreement to acquire Community Education Centers (“CEC”), which we hope to close during the second quarter of 2017.

Elements of Compensation

Our compensation program for named executive officers consists of the following components:

Each of these components is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table and is also discussed in further detail below.

Why Each Element of Compensation is Paid and How the Amount of Each Element is Determined

The following is a brief discussion of each element of our named executive officer compensation. The Compensation Committee considers each of these elements in order to ensure that a desirable overall mix is established between base compensation and incentive compensation, cash andnon-cash compensation and annual and long-term compensation. The committeeCompensation Committee also evaluates on a periodic basis the overall competitiveness of our executive compensation packages as compared to packages offered in the marketplace for which we compete for executive talent. Overall, our Compensation Committee believes that our executive compensation packages are currently appropriately balanced and structured to retain and motivate our named executive officers, who we believe constitute the most experienced senior management team in our industry. The Compensation Committee evaluates GEO’s executive compensation policies and practices on an ongoing basis.

Base Salaries. The cash salaries paid to the named executive officers are incorporated into the terms of existing executive employment agreements with our named executive officers. Any increases in salaries have been made

either pursuant to the terms of the employment agreements or at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.

Mr. Zoley, who also serves as our Chairman, receives no additional compensation for his board service, so his annual base salary reflects the workload, responsibilities and contributions made by Mr. Zoley as our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman.

For 2016,2019, our Compensation Committee did not adjust Mr. Zoley’s salary but determined it was appropriate to increase the annual base salaries of Messrs. Zoley, Evans, BulfinDonahue, and WierdsmaVenturella by approximately 3% as compared to their 20152018 annual base salaries.salaries following their individual performance assessments reflecting their individual contributions to the strong financial and operational performance of the Company discussed above and a review of projected executive salary increases in the market. For 2019, our Compensation Committee determined it was appropriate to increase the annual base salary of Ms. Schlarb by approximately 1% as compared to her 2018 annual base salary following her individual performance assessment and a review of projected executive salary increases in the market. Additionally, Ms. Schlarb’s annual base salary had been increased in 2018 by approximately 4% as compared to her 2017 annual base salary as compared to the other named executive officers whose compensation had been increased in 2018 by approximately 2%.

Annual Cash Incentive Compensation. Annual cash incentive compensation for each of our named executive officers is governed by our Senior Management Performance Award Plan, as Amended and Restated on April 27, 2016, which was approved by our shareholders at the Company’s 2016 annual meeting of shareholders in accordance with the performance-based compensation exception (“Performance-Based Exception”) under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) that such a plan be approved by shareholders at least once every five years. PaymentsAlthough the Performance-Based Exception has been repealed, payments to the Chief Executive Officer made in accordance with this plan are intended to still be tax deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code.Code because such payments to the Chief Executive Officer should be grandfathered from the repeal of the Performance-Based Exception for the Company’s 2019 fiscal year. The plan is administered by our Compensation Committee, which has the authority to make all discretionary determinations necessary or

appropriate under the plan. The plan is governed by the Compensation Committee and is administered on a day to day basis by the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President of Human Resources.

Under the plan, each of our named executive officers is eligible to receive annual cash incentive compensation based on our relative achievement of budgeted revenue and net income after tax for the fiscal year. We believe revenue and net income after tax are meaningful metrics to assess our performance andperformance. The metrics are used by our management team when it develops its annual operating plan and budget and are used by our investors in evaluating our performance against the annual financial guidance we give on revenue and net income. For purposes of the plan, net income after tax means our net income after all federal, state and local taxes. Extraordinary items and changes in accounting principles, as defined by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, may be disregarded in determining our net income after tax.income.Non-recurring and unusual items not included or planned for in our annual budget may also be excluded from net income after tax in the sole and absolute discretion of the Compensation Committee. In determining the amount of annual incentive cash compensation awarded, our net income after tax is weighted 65% and our revenue is weighted 35% (collectively, the “Target Weighting of Revenue andNet-Income-After-Tax”).

Awards under the plan are made as follows: (i) targets for budgeted revenue and net income after tax are set at the beginning of each fiscal year; (ii) the plan includes for each named executive officer an annual incentive target amount as a percentage of the officer’s salary which forms the basis for computing the officer’s award under the plan; and (iii) at the end of the fiscal year, a multiplier set forth in the plan that is based on our relative achievement of budgeted revenue and net income after tax for the fiscal year is applied to each officer’s annual incentive target amount referenced in (ii) above. The multiplier is the same for all named executive officers.

The following table shows, for each named executive officer, the annual incentive target amount as a percentage of salary that the respective officer is eligible to receive under the Amended and Restated Senior Management Performance Award Plan.

The following table shows how each named executive officer’s annual incentive cash compensation award is calculated by applying a percentage adjustment methodology, or multiplier, separately to the respective Target Weighting of Revenue andNet-Income-After-Tax results on a straight-line basis:

In addition to the calculations described above, if the budgeted goals for revenue and net income after tax are exceeded, the annual incentive amounts for the Chief Financial Officer and the other Senior Vice Presidents may be adjusted up to an additional 50% upon the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee based on the results of an individual performance assessment. The Chief Executive Officer is not eligible for positive individual performance adjustments. The Compensation Committee and the Chief Executive Officer consider the contribution of the particular officer during the fiscal year when determining whether to grant the discretionary award.make an individual performance adjustment.

Under the terms of the plan, no amendment to the plan may alter the performance goals, increase the maximum amount which can be awarded to any participant, change the class of eligible employees or make any other change that would require shareholder approval under the exemption for performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, in each case, without the prior approval of our shareholders (to the extent required under the performance-based compensation exception of Section 162(m) of the Code).

20162019 Cash Incentive Outcomes

In 2016,2019, the Company achieved Net Income after Taxincome and Revenue performance levels in excess ofabove the Adjusted Net Income after Tax targets and just short of the Revenue target.target performance objective. The table below provides the 20162019 cash incentive outcomes based on the Adjusted Net Income after Taxincome and Revenue performance levels actually achieved.

Based on these results, the following annual incentive amounts were awarded to the Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 20162019 performance:

2019 Equity CompensationIncentive Awards.

Our Compensation Committee has historically granted awards under our equity compensation plans to our key employees and members of our board of directors to createsupport a more performance-oriented culture and to further align the interests of management and our shareholders.

Our current equity compensation plan is The GEO Group, Inc. 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), which was approved by our shareholders at our 2014 annual meeting of shareholders. The 2014 Plan replaced our 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”) and since the date our shareholders approved the 2014 Plan, no further grants can be made under the 2006 Plan although there are outstanding awards under the 2006 Plan. Since the adoption of the 2006 Plan and the 2014 Plan, we have issued 2,878,406 shares of restricted stock (excluding cancelled shares) and stock options representing the right to acquire 2,384,350 shares of common stock. Beginning in 2012, our restricted stock grants to our executive officers have performance-based vesting which we believe is appropriate to foster a performance-oriented culture and align the interests of management and our shareholders. Further, we believe this approach is consistent with the approach taken by our peers in the equity REIT sector and our industry, and is reflective of the performance-based compensation program that our shareholders support. As of March 3, 2017, there was a total of 1,200,746 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance in connection with future awards under the 2014 Plan.

Our Compensation Committee has historically granted awards under our equity compensation plans either at the time of our annual shareholders’ meeting or following the end of our fiscal year in connection with the completion of our annual compensation cycle; however, we have varied our practice in recent years. For example, on June 1, 2013 and May 14, 2015, we granted restricted stock awards to employees, management andnon-employee directors. In the future, we may from time to time grant equity awards throughout the year. Equity compensation awards are priced as of the close of business on the date of grant.

The amounts of awards granted under our equity compensation plans are determined by the Compensation Committee after taking into account the following factors: the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer (other than for his awards), the availability of awards for issuance companywide, competitive market practices, the overall performance of the Company and the individual performances of the grantees.

Under the 2006 Plan and the 2014 Plan, shares of restricted stock may have performance-based or time-based vesting. If the vesting is performance based, vesting is tied to the achievement of predetermined metrics set by the Compensation Committee and included in the applicable equity grant instrument. If vesting is time based, the shares vest at the rate of 25% per year in each of the four years following the date of grant, subject to vesting acceleration in the case of a change in control as defined in our plan. Beginning in 2012, our restricted stock grants to our executive officers have performance-based vesting. Except for stock option awards to Mr. Zoley prior to 2008, and stock option awards granted tonon-employee directors in 2009, which all vested immediately on the date of grant, stock options vest 20% immediately and an additional 20% on each of the four anniversary dates immediately following the grant date.

We believe that equity compensation awards offer significant motivation to our officers and employees and serve to align their interests with those of our shareholders. While the Compensation Committee will continually evaluate the use of equity compensation — both types and amounts — it intends to continue to use such awards as part of the company’s overall compensation program.

2016 Equity Incentive Awards

On February 12, 2016,March 1, 2019, GEO granted performance-based restricted stock to our named executive officers that vest, if earned, on March 11,15, 2022 using the same performance criteria as the grants made in 2018.

For 2019, based on two performance metrics measured from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018 as follows: (i) 50% of the award is determined based on GEO’s relative total shareholder return as compared to the FTSE NAREIT EQUITY REIT INDEX and (ii) 50% of the award is determined based on GEO’s return on capital employed (“ROCE”) performance against targets using an average of ROCE over 2016, 2017 and 2018. For 2016, 100% of our equity incentive awards provided to the NEOs were in the form of performance-based

restricted stock awards which was much more performance oriented than the mix of performance and time vested equity awards observed across the peer group. On average, the peers deliver approximately 50% of their long-term incentive to NEOs in time-vested equity.

The following table lists the number of performance-based shares of restricted stock granted to each named executive officer in 2016:2019:

Specifically, the performance targets for the 2019 performance-based restricted stock grants are:

The threshold required for payment under the ROCEreturn on capital employed (“ROCE”) metric is set at +1% of our weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) over the three-year measurement period to ensure that payments only occur during periods of positive returns. The WACC is a product of the cost of our capital over the performance period and will not be known until the performance period has concluded.

Additionally, we have adoptedthere is a performance “governor” that caps payouts under the Relative TSR metric at 100% of target if GEO’s absolute TSR is negative over the3-year period. Performance below threshold results in 0% payout on that specific metric.

In 2016, the Compensation Committee approved a shift in the mix of the performance metrics from 75% Relative TSR/25% ROCE to 50% Relative TSR/50% ROCE for the following reasons:

Equity Incentive Outcomes for 20142017 to 20162019 Performance Cycle

On February 20, 2014,March 1, 2017, the Compensation Committee granted target awards of performance-based restricted stock vesting over a three yearthree-year period beginning January 1, 20142017 provided that certain TSR performance goals and ROCE goals were met as of December 31, 2016.2019. Specifically, the performance targets were:

Performance Metric		Metric Weighting		Threshold		Target		Maximum
Relative TSR		50%		P30		P50		P90
Return on Capital Employed		50%		+1% of WACC		9%		12%
		Payouts (% of Target)		30%		100%		200%

The Compensation Committee engaged Pay Governance to calculate the final TSR rank and payout calculations for the TSR component of these awards. Pay Governance determined that based upon their calculations for the Company and the FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs Index, the Company’s 2014-20162017-2019 TSR of 33.7%-15.69% places the Company in the 3713^th percentile of the peer group which results in a TSR component payout of 54.5%0%. Management of the Company calculated the return on capital employed component of the performance-based restricted stock

to be 11.4% which results in a ROCE component payout of 179.9%180% of the target award. Based on the calculations of the TSR component and the ROCE component, management of the Company certified to the Compensation Committee that when the TSR component is combined with the ROCE component, the combined equityaward payout is 85.9%approximately 90% of the target award. As a result ofAfter reviewing the information provided to the Compensation Committee by Pay Governance and management, the Compensation Committee approved the vesting of the performance-based restricted stock in the amounts provided below:

2020 Compensation Actions

Base Salary

For 2020, our Compensation Committee determined it was appropriate to increase the annual base salaries of Messrs. Zoley, Evans, Donahue, and Venturella and Ms. Schlarb by 3% as compared to their 2019 annual base salaries.

Annual Cash Incentive Opportunities

The annual cash incentive compensation for fiscal year 2020 performance will be determined under the Senior Management Performance Award Plan consistent with the methodology used in 2019 based on the budgeted Net income and Budgeted Revenue 2020 performance goals set by the Compensation Committee. In 2019, the Compensation Committee reviewed peer group practice information, GEO’s historical performance outcomes and broader market best practices for incentive designs presented by the independent compensation consultant. In March 2020, the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors approved certain amendments to the Senior Management Performance Award Plan for fiscal year 2020 to better align with market practices. The changes are only to the performance and payout relationship (performance range) for the Net Income and Revenue goals. For fiscal year 2020, the performance and payout relationship range for both metrics are presented in the table below:

2017 Compensation ActionsAdditionally, all senior officers will be eligible to achieve a maximum award of 200% of target for meeting or exceeding the maximum performance level under the plan. Previously, the CEO’s award was capped at 150% of target and other senior officers could realize an additional 50% (up to a maximum of 200%) based on the results of an individual performance assessment. The individual performance adjustment factor will not be part of the Senior Management Performance Award Plan beginning with fiscal year 2020.

Equity Incentive Awards

Effective March 1, 2017, GEOThe Compensation Committee granted performance-based restricted stock awards on March 1, 2020 to our named executive officers that vestswill vest on March 10, 202015, 2023 based on two performance metrics measured from January 1, 20172020 to December 31, 20192022 as follows: (i) up to 50% of the shares of restricted stock in each award vest if GEO meets certain relative TSR performance targets for the3-year period; and (ii) up to 50% of the shares of restricted stock in each award can vest if GEO meets certain ROCE performance targets for the3-year period. For 2017,2020, 100% of the equity grants made to executivesauthorized for the named executive officers were performance based.

The following lists the number of performance-based shares granted to each of the 2019 named executive officer:officers:

Other Benefits and Perquisites. Our executive compensation program includes other benefits and perquisites as more fully reflected onin the table set forth below titled “All Other Compensation.” These benefits and perquisites are reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee with respect to amounts and appropriateness. Currently, the benefits and perquisites which the named executive officers are eligible to receive fall into four general categories: (i) retirement benefits pursuant to our executive retirement agreement in the case of Mr. Zoley and pursuant to our senior officer retirement plan in the case of the other named executive officers; (ii) benefits under certain other deferred compensation plans; (iii) value attributable to life insurance we afford our named executive officers beyond that which is offered to our other employees generally; and (iv) travel and entertainment perquisites, such as an automobile allowance, club dues and personal use of the corporate jet.aircraft. For 2016,

2019, Mr. Zoley was allotted thirty (30) hours of personal use of the corporate aircraft. For 2016,2019, the Board authorized the allotment of five (5) hours of personal use of the corporate aircraft for Mr. Evans.

Mr. Zoley’s Executive Retirement Agreement.Agreement in Place for 2019

Through 2019, Mr. Zoley hashad an executive retirement agreement that requiresrequired us to pay him a lump sum amount on the date thatupon his employment with GEO ends.retirement. Such amount iswas determined by his age at the time of retirement with the amount increasing by approximately 4% per year up to age 71. Mr. Zoley’s retirement agreement formerly included a taxgross-up provision for taxes applicable to his lump sum retirement payment. In 2012, Mr. Zoley agreed to amend his retirement agreement to eliminate the taxgross-up provision. In exchange for this amendment, the amount of the lump sum retirement payment which Mr. Zoley was entitled to receive was proportionally increased so that Mr. Zoley would be entitled to receive substantially the same net benefit he would otherwise have received if the taxgross-up had remained in place. Mr. Zoley’s benefits under the executive retirement agreement arewere fully vested and he will therefore bewas entitled to receive the amount called for by the agreement whenever his employment with GEO iswas terminated for any reason, whether by GEO or by him. If Mr. Zoley had retired at December 31, 2016,2019, we would have had to pay him a total of $7.7$8.6 million. The $7.7 million will beThis amount would have been delivered in alump-sum amount and equates to $239,287$245,404 annually when divided by his 3235 years of service with the company. The amount owedCompany.

Changes to Mr. Zoley’s Executive Retirement Agreement for 2020

Per a mutual agreement between the Chief Executive Officer and the Board of Directors signed February 26, 2020 (the “Effective Date”), Mr. Zoley entered into an amended and restated executive retirement agreement (the “2020 Amended and Restated Agreement”). In doing so, he elected to forgo his age 71 annuity funding deposit of $347,975 guaranteed under the prior executive retirement agreement. This results in a frozen annuity funding

amount at the age 70 amount of $8,925,065 under the prior executive retirement agreement toas reflected in the table below.

RETIREMENT PAYMENT TABLE

The frozen annuity funding amount of $8,925,065 (known as the “Grandfathered Payment” under the plan) served as the starting balance under the 2020 Amended and Restated Agreement. This amount was then converted into 553,665 shares of GEO’s common stock using the closing price on the effective date of $16.12 per share.

Going forward, the value of the account will track the total shareholder return (share price + dividend distributions) of GEO’s shares of common stock over the period in which the agreement remains in place. No value will be guaranteed under the 2020 Amended and Restated Agreement like it was under the prior agreement. As such, Mr. Zoley has effectively exchanged a “fixed” retirement amount for an “at risk” retirement amount that is fully aligned with shareholders over the remainder of his career with GEO. For example, the 553,665 shares of GEO common stock constituting the Grandfathered Payment was worth $6.7 million on March 31, 2020 based on the closing price of $12.16 per share on that day. That is equivalent to a decrease of $2.2 million, or approximately 25%, as compared to the guaranteed payment under his prior executive retirement agreement.

The 2020 Amended and Restated Agreement does not provide for additional guaranteed Company deposits. Dividend distributions will be credited to the account on the date dividends are paid to other GEO shareholders as if they were reinvested in additional shares of common stock on that date. The Company will not make any further cash or share-based deposits into the account beyond these credited dividends.

The final balance will be equal to the number of shares of common stock times the share price per share on the date of his retirement and will be paid in shares of GEO common stock in compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Company has established grantor trusts for the purpose of paying the retirement benefit pursuant to the 2020 Amended and Restated Agreement. The trusts are revocable “rabbi trusts” and the assets of the trusts shall be subject to the claims of the Company’s creditors in the event of the Company’s insolvency. Mr. Zoley will be solely responsible for the taxes due upon the distribution of the GEO shares of common stock to him upon his retirement and upon his election the Company can withhold GEO shares of common stock that would have otherwise been distributed to him in order to pay the taxes due. The Company will not subsidize or “gross-up” amounts to cover any taxes. Mr. Zoley has been vested in his executive retirement agreement since he reached age 55 under the prior executive retirement agreement and as a result he will be payableeligible to receive the shares of GEO common stock held by the rabbi trusts upon retiring from the general assetsCompany.

For a full description and a copy of GEO.the 2020 Amended and Restated Agreement, please see the Form 8-K the Company filed on February 28, 2020.

Senior Officer Retirement Plan. Messrs. Evans, Bulfin, WierdsmaDonahue, Venturella and DonahueMs. Schlarb currently participate in our senior officer retirement plan, which is offered to all of our Senior Vice Presidents. The senior officer retirement plan is a defined benefit plan and, subject to certain maximum and minimum provisions, provides for the payment to the officer of a monthly retirement benefit based on a percentage of the officer’s final average annual salary earned during the employee’s last five years of credited service (excluding bonus) multiplied by the employee’s years of credited service. A participant will vest in his or her benefits under the senior officer retirement plan upon the completion of ten (10) years of service. The amount of benefit increases for each full year beyond ten (10) years of service except that there are no further increases after twenty-five (25) years of service. The maximum target benefit under the senior officer retirement plan is 45% of final average salary. Reduced benefits are payable for lesser service and early retirement. Benefits under the senior officer retirement plan are offset 100% by social security benefits received by the officer and are computed on the basis of a straight-life annuity. The plan also provides forpre-retirement death and disability benefits. Amounts owing under the plan are payable from the general assets of the Company.

Deferred Compensation Plans. Our named executive officers are currently excluded from participating in our 401(k) plan by virtue of their compensation level. Accordingly, we have established a deferred compensation plan for certain employees, including the named executive officers, which permits them to defer up to 100% of their compensation to provide for their retirement. Under the deferred compensation plan, the Company may make matching contributions on a discretionary basis. Mr.Messrs. Evans, Donahue, Venturella and Mr. Bulfin are the only named executive officers whoMs. Schlarb currently participate in the deferred compensation plan.

Excess Group Life Insurance. We pay rates for the life insurance policies of our named executive officers above the level that is excludable under applicable tax rules. Payments in connection with the resulting excess coverage are treated as imputed income to the officers and are not deductible by the Company.

How Each Compensation Element Fits into the Overall Compensation Objectives and Affects Decisions Regarding Other Elements

In establishing compensation packages for executive officers, numerous factors are considered, including the particular executive’s experience, expertise and performance, the Company’s overall performance and compensation packages available in the marketplace for similar positions. In arriving at amounts for each component of compensation, our Compensation Committee strives to strike an appropriate balance between base compensation and incentive compensation, including equity based compensation and cash awards under the Senior Management Performance Award Plan. The committeeCompensation Committee also endeavors to properly allocate between cash andnon-cash compensation (subject to the availability of equity compensation awards under our then current equity compensation plans), and between annual and long-term compensation.

When considering the marketplace, particular emphasis is placed upon compensation packages available at a comparable group of peer companies.

As discussed earlier,In 2012, Pay Governance completed in 2012 a report on behalf of the Compensation Committee to evaluate its executive compensation program in light of the marketplace to make sure the program is competitive. Additionally,In 2015, Pay Governance completed in 2015 an assessment of Mr. Zoley’s total compensation in light of the marketplace and the ISS peer group specifically. TheIn 2018, Pay Governance completed a peer group analysis to evaluate the compensation levels of our named executive officers. In 2019, the Compensation Committee intendsrequested that Pay Governance provide the Compensation Committee with a report of its review and analysis of executive and director compensation levels, policies, practices, and procedures with a comparison to continuea set of peer companies selected by the Compensation Committee with input from Pay Governance. Pay Governance prepared and submitted the annual report on this practice on a periodic basis incomparative study to the future.Compensation Committee.

Executive and Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Company adopted stock ownership guidelines in 2012 applicable to our senior executive officers, including our named executive officers, and our board members. The guidelines, as most recently amended in 2018, require

our CEO to maintain equity holdings in GEO equal in value to at least 5x6 times his annual base salary, our other executive officers to maintain equity holdings in GEO equal in value to at least 3x3 times their annual base salaries, and ournon-employee directors to maintain equity holdings in GEO equal in value to at least 3x3 times their annual cash retainers. The guidelines as most recently amended also specify that shares which will count toward the total share ownership requirement are actual shares owned, options and restricted shares, vested and unvested, and unvested performance share awards at the threshold level. Performance share awards at the target and maximum level will not be counted until the performance metrics have been met and the performance shares have vested. All officers and directors must satisfy the stock ownership guidelines five years from September 1, 2012 or the date of their appointment as director or a senior executive office, if appointed after September 1, 2012.officer.

Clawback/Recoupment Policy

The Company maintains a clawback policy providing that any incentive payment awarded by GEO to an executive officer (including a named executive officer) under any GEO incentive compensation plan may be recouped by GEO in the event of material fraud or misconduct by the recipient among other triggers.and in the event of a required accounting restatement of GEO’s financial statements (whether or not based on misconduct) due to the material noncompliance of GEO with any financial reporting requirement under U.S. federal securities laws.

Prohibited Transactions Under the Insider Trading PolicyProhibition of Hedging and Pledging of Company Shares

The Company prohibits certain transactions in the Company’s securities under the terms of its insider trading policy, including engaging in hedging transactions to hedge against losses on the Company’s securities, including but not limited to collars, forward sale contracts, trading in publicly traded options, puts, calls or other derivative instruments, and engaging in short sales of the Company’s securities, trading in options, warrants, putssecurities. Additionally, directors, officers and calls or similar instruments on the Company’s securities and holdingemployees may not hold Company securities in margin accounts.accounts or otherwise pledge Company securities as collateral for a loan unless a waiver from this restriction is granted by the Chief Executive Officer or the Chairman of the Compensation Committee.

CONCLUSION

We believe that our compensation programs appropriately reward executive performance and closely align the interests of our named executive officers and key employees with the interests of our shareholders, while also enabling the Company to attract, retain, and motivate talented executives. The Compensation Committee will continue to evolve and administer our compensation program in a manner that the Compensation Committee believes will be in the best interests of our shareholders. The Compensation Committee monitors the results of the advisory vote on our executive compensation (referred to as the“say-on-pay” vote) and incorporates such results as one of many factors considered in connection with the discharge of its responsibilities.

SUBMITTED BY THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS:

Richard H. Glanton, Chairman

Anne N. Foreman

Christopher C. Wheeler

Compensation Policies and Practices as They Relate to Risk Management

Our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain our officers and to motivate them to increase shareholder value on both an annual and longer term basis primarily by generating increasing levels of revenue and net income. To that end, compensation packages include significant forms of incentive compensation to ensure that an executive officer’s interest is aligned with the interests of our shareholders in generating revenue and net income. Based upon the Compensation Committee’s regular review of the Company’s compensation policies and practices, the Compensation committeeCommittee determined that the risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for our employees are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table shows compensation earned by each of the named executive officers of GEO during 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, for services in all capacities while they were employees of GEO, and the capacities in which the services were rendered. For purposes of this proxy statement, GEO’s named executive officers are (i) the Chief Executive Officer of GEO, (ii) the Chief Financial Officer of GEO, and (iii) each of the three most highly compensated executive officers as of December 31, 2019 of GEO other than the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer.

(4)(5)

The following sets forth for each named executive officer the description and amount of each item comprising each officer’s total compensation appearing in the “All Other Compensation” column for 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014:2017:

CERTAIN MATERIAL EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AGREEMENTS AND ARRANGEMENTS

The following executive compensation agreements and arrangements are material to an understanding of the amounts paid and/or payable to our named executive officers disclosed in the table above.

Executive Employment Agreements

Effective August 22, 2012, we entered into a Third Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement with Mr. Zoley, which was amended by the First Amendment, dated April 29, 2013, the Second Amendment, dated May 29, 2013, and the Third Amendment, dated May 14,June 1, 2015 (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”). The Employment Agreement has a continuously rolling three-year term.

The Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Zoley is entitled to receive a target annual performance award of up to a maximum of 150% of his annual base salary in accordance with the Senior Management Performance Award Plan.

The Employment Agreement provides that upon the termination of the agreement for any reason other than by GEO for cause (as defined in the Employment Agreement) or by Mr. Zoley without good reason (as defined in the Employment Agreement), he will be entitled to receive a termination payment equal to 2 (two) times his annual base salary plus target bonus for the fiscal year in which his employment is terminated or, if greater, the target bonus for the fiscal year immediately prior to such termination. In addition, the Employment Agreement provides that upon such termination, GEO will transfer all of its interest in any automobile used by the executive pursuant to its employee automobile policy and pay the balance of any outstanding loans or leases on such automobile so that the executive owns the automobile outright. In the event such automobile is leased, the Employment Agreement provides that GEO will pay the residual cost of the lease.

Upon the termination of the Employment Agreement by GEO for cause or by Mr. Zoley without good reason, Mr. Zoley will be entitled to only the amount of compensation that is due through the effective date of the termination, including any performance award that may bethe retirement benefit due and payable to him under the terms of the Senior Management Performance Award Plan.his executive retirement agreement. The Employment Agreement includes anon-competition covenant that runs through the three-year period following the termination of the executive’s employment, and customary confidentiality provisions.

The Employment Agreement reflectsfor Mr. Zoley reflected an annual base salary for Mr. Zoley for 2016 of $1,000,000 for 2015 and provides that the annual base salary is subject to increases in the sole discretion of the Board, to befuture as determined by the board of directors.Compensation Committee in its sole discretion. Additionally, the Employment Agreement provides that all outstanding unvested stock options and restricted stock granted to Mr. Zoley fully vest immediately upon a “termination without cause” as such term is defined in his employment agreements, as approved by the Compensation Committee. However, any restricted stock that is still subject to performance based vesting at the time of such termination shall only vest when, and to the extent, the Compensation Committee of the board of directors certifies that the performance goals have been met.

Senior Officer Employment Agreements

We have senior officer employment agreements with Messrs. Evans Donahue, Bulfin and Wierdsma.Venturella, and Ms. Schlarb. The employment agreements have rollingtwo-year terms which continue until each executive reaches age 67 absent their earlier termination. We also have a senior officer employment agreement in place with Mr. Donahue through July 11, 2020, his retirement date.

The amounts of base salaries that were paid to each of these executives during fiscal years 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table above. The executives are also entitled to receive a target annual incentive bonus in accordance with the terms of our Senior Management Performance Award Plan which is further described below.

The senior officer employment agreements provide that upon the termination of the agreement for any reason other than by GEO for cause (as defined in the employment agreement) or by the voluntary resignation of the executive, the executive will be entitled to receive a termination payment equal to the following: (1) two years of the executive’s then current annual base salary; plus (2) the continuation of the executive’s employee benefits (as defined in the employment agreement) for a period of two years, plus (3) the dollar value of the sum of paid vacation time that the executive was entitled to take immediately prior to the termination which was not in fact taken by the executive. In addition, the employment agreements provide that upon such termination of the executive, we will transfer all of our interest in any automobile used by the executive pursuant to our employee automobile policy and pay the balance of any outstanding loans or leases on such automobile so that the executive owns the automobile outright. In the event such automobile is leased, the employment agreements provide that we will pay the residual cost of the lease. Also, upon such termination, all of the executive’s unvested stock options and restricted stock will fully vest immediately.immediately, provided however, that any restricted stock that is still subject to performance based vesting at the time of such termination shall only vest when and to the extent the Compensation Committee of the Board certifies that the performance goals were actually met.

Upon the termination of the employment agreements by us for cause or by the voluntary resignation of the executive, the executive will be entitled to only the amount of salary, bonus, and employee benefits that is due through the effective date of the termination. Each employment agreement includes anon-competition covenant that runs through thetwo-year period following the termination of the executive’s employment, and customary confidentiality provisions.

Under the terms of the employment agreements, annual base salaries for 20162019 approved by the Compensation Committee for Messrs. Evans, Donahue Bulfin and WierdsmaVenturella and Ms. Schlarb were $562,755, $500,000, $489,597$620,792, $551,565, $409,609 and $433,321,$446,505, respectively. Additionally, all outstanding unvested stock options and restricted stock granted to each of Messrs. Zoley, Evans, Donahue Bulfin and WierdsmaVenturella and Ms. Schlarb fully vest immediately upon a “termination without cause” as such term is defined in each of their employment agreements, as approved by the compensation committee.Compensation Committee. Performance based awards will only vest upon the determination by the Compensation Committee that the established performance goals have been met.

Executive Retirement Agreement

We also haveDuring 2019, we had in place an executive retirement agreement with Mr. Zoley. The retirement agreement providesprovided that upon the later of (i) the date he actually retires from employment with GEO, or (ii) his 55th birthday, GEO willwould make a lump sum payment to Mr. Zoley. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” for the amount we would have had to pay Mr. Zoley as of December 31, 20162019 pursuant to his executive retirement agreement had he retired at his current age as of that date.

The retirement agreement providesprovided that if the executive should die after his 55th birthday but before he retires from GEO, GEO shall immediately pay to the executive’s beneficiary(ies) or estate the amount GEO would have paid to the executive had he retired immediately prior to his death. The retirement agreement includesincludednon-competition provisions that run for atwo-year period after the termination of the executive’s employment. Mr. Zoley has reached the age of 55. On February 26, 2020, we entered into the 2020 Amended and Restated Agreement with Mr. Zoley. Please see the discussion of the 2020 Amended and Restated Agreement in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis section above.

Senior Officer Retirement Plan

GEO maintains a senior officer retirement plan for all of its Senior Vice Presidents, including Mr. Evans, Mr. Donahue, Mr. BulfinVenturella and Mr. Wierdsma.Ms. Schlarb. The senior officer retirement plan is anon-qualified defined benefit plan and, subject to certain maximum and minimum provisions, provides for the payment to the officer of a monthly retirement benefit based on a percentage of the officer’s final average annual salary earned during the employee’s last five years of credited service (excluding bonus) multiplied by the employee’s years of credited service. A participant will vest in his or her benefits under the senior officer retirement plan upon the completion of ten (10) years of service, provided such participant remains continuously employed by the Company until at

least age fifty fivefifty-five (55). The amount of benefit increases for each full year beyond ten (10) years of service except that there are no further increases after twenty-five (25) years of service. The maximum target benefit under the senior officer retirement plan is 45% of final average annual salary. Reduced benefits are payable for lesser service and early retirement. Benefits under the senior officer retirement plan are offset one hundred percent (100%) by social security benefits received (or estimated social security benefits to be received, if applicable) by the officer and are computed on the basis of a straight-life annuity. The plan also provides forpre-retirement death and disability benefits. Amounts owing under the plan are payable from the general assets of the company.Company. Mr. Donahue is a participant under the Senior Officer Retirement Plan. At the time of his retirement on July 11, 2020, Mr. Donahue will have completed in excess of ten (10) years of service. As a result, Mr. Donahue will be entitled to receive a retirement payment of approximately $0.5 million under the terms of the Senior Officer Retirement Plan.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table sets forth information about our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under all of our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2019, including our 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, our 2014 Stock Incentive Plan and our 2018 Stock Incentive Plan. Our shareholders have approved all of these plans.